Consequences of Poor Implementation of Performance Management System

    If performance management is poorly implemented, then the organization is likely to face the following consequences:

    1. Increased Turnover: If the process is not seen as fair, employees may become upset and leave the organization.

    They can leave physically (i.e., quit) or withdraw psychologically (i.e., minimize their effort until they are able to find a job elsewhere).

    2. Use of Misleading Information: If a standardized system is not in place, there are multiple opportunities for fabricating information about an employee’s performance.

    3. Lowered Self-Esteem: Self-esteem may be lowered if the feedback is provided inappropriately and inaccurately. This, in turn, can create employee resentment.

    4. Wasted Time and Money: Performance management systems cost money and quite a bit of time. These resources are wasted when systems are poorly designed and implemented.

    5. Damaged Relationships: As a consequence of a deficient system, the relationship among the individuals involved may be damaged, often permanently.

    6. Decreased Motivation to Perform: Motivation may be lowered for many reasons, including the feeling that superior performance is not translated into meaningful tangible (e.g., pay increase) or intangible (e.g., personal recognition) rewards.

    7. Employee Burn-Out and Job Dissatisfaction: When the performance assessment instrument is not seen as valid, and the system is not perceived as fair, employees are likely to feel increased levels of job burnout and job dissatisfaction.

    As a consequence, employees are likely to become increasingly irritated.

    8. Increased Risk of Litigation: Expensive lawsuits may be filed by individuals who feel they have been appraised unfairly.

    9. Unjustified Demands on Managers and Employees’ Resources: Poorly implemented systems do not provide the benefits provided by well-implemented systems, yet they still take up managers’ and employees’ time.

    Such systems will be resisted because of competing obligations and allocation of resources (e.g., time).

    What is sometimes worse, managers may simply choose to avoid the system altogether, and employees may feel increased levels of overload.

    10. Varying and Unfair Standards and Ratings: Both standards and individual ratings may vary across and within units and also be unfair.

    11. Emerging Biases: Personal values, biases, and relationships are likely to replace organizational standards.

    12. Unclear Rating System: Because of poor communication, employees may not know how their ratings are generated and how the ratings are translated into rewards.

    Disclaimer: While we make every effort to update the information, products, and services on our website and related platforms/websites, inadvertent inaccuracies, typographical errors, or delays in updating the information may occur. The material provided on this site and associated web pages is for reference and general information purposes only. In case of any inconsistencies between the information provided on this site and the respective product/service document, the details mentioned in the product/service document shall prevail. Subscribers and users are advised to seek professional advice before acting on the information contained herein. It is recommended that users make an informed decision regarding any product or service after reviewing the relevant product/service document and applicable terms and conditions. If any inconsistencies are observed, please reach out to us.

    Latest Articles

    Related Stories

    Leave A Reply

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here

    Join our newsletter and stay updated!